Steven C. Harper

Historian of early Latter-day Saint history and religious experience who has written on the Book of Mormon witnesses and on temple ritual and Freemasonry.

history · religious studies

Degree
PhD, Lehigh University
1
PhD, Lehigh University, 2001

Church History and Doctrine Faculty — BYU Catalog

Brigham Young University · as of

Original · Archived

Affiliation
Professor of Church History and Doctrine, Brigham Young University
2
Steven C. Harper - Professor

Church History and Doctrine Faculty — BYU Catalog

Brigham Young University · as of

Original · Archived

Positions

How should the differing First Vision accounts be understood?

Harper interprets the accounts as successive acts of remembering a real experience, shaped by present concerns, retrieval cues, audiences, and growing understanding. Differences therefore need not indicate invention, and later accounts need not be less accurate simply because they are later; his book also traces how the vision became a shared founding memory.

Rather, they are products of Joseph Smith’s subjective, constructive process of remembering.

What is the relationship between the Nauvoo endowment and Freemasonry?

Harper suggests that Joseph Smith used familiar Masonic ideas and ritual forms to teach a revealed plan of salvation and covenant relationship with God. He distinguishes the forms of the ceremony from the endowment of divine power and argues that similarities and chronology alone do not establish the full causal relationship.

Joseph seems to have used Masonry as a point of departure, a beginning rather than an end in itself.

“Scholarly Observations,” opening sentence (p. 152) · Original

What did the Book of Mormon witnesses experience, and how should their testimonies be weighed?

Harper argues that the witnesses understood their experiences as both spiritually enabled and encounters with real plates. He gives priority to their direct statements and sustained reaffirmations over conflicting hearsay, and holds that references to spiritual sight do not cancel the physical reality they described.

Some of them are on record expressing certainty in the reality of the plates and their divine translation.

Discussion following note 43 · Original

Corrections