Matthew Roper

Researcher who writes on Book of Mormon texts, origins, and the reliability of witness accounts.

history · religious studies

Degree
MA, Brigham Young University
1
He earned his MA from Brigham Young University.

Matthew Roper — BYU Studies Author Page

Brigham Young University · as of

Original · Archived

Affiliation
Research Associate, Laura F. Willes Center for Book of Mormon Studies, Maxwell Institute
2
Matthew Roper is Research Associate for the Laura F. Willes Center for Book of Mormon Studies, a part of the Maxwell Institute.

Matthew Roper — BYU Studies Author Page

Brigham Young University · as of

Original · Archived

Positions

How do the Book of Mormon's physical and textual details fit its stated ancient setting?

Miller and Roper argue that animal references should be evaluated alongside cross-cultural naming practices, preservation conditions, and the difficulty of establishing final extinction dates. They propose that some species could have survived later than their youngest known remains, and that some familiar names may designate different American animals; they present these as possible explanations for the text’s animal references.

Populations of animals (or plants) could have lived for prolonged periods and yet provide little or no evidence of their existence.

Section “Extinction of Animals and the Record of Past Life” · Original · Archived

What did the Book of Mormon witnesses experience, and how should their testimonies be weighed?

Roper argues that the witnesses’ later religious differences and other spiritual commitments do not establish that they withdrew their Book of Mormon testimony. He reads their repeated statements as affirming the reality of their encounters and argues that spiritual and bodily perception need not exclude each other.

Evidence for later disbelief in the Book of Mormon by the witnesses is unpersuasive.

Corrections